CDC Needs More $$$ to Fight HIV

CDC officials on Tuesday at a House Government Reform and Oversight Committee hearing said they would need an additional $4.8 billion dollars over the next five years to reduce the annual number of new HIV infections in the U.S. As many of you may know, the CDC released a study last month that found that about 56,300 new HIV infections occur annually in the U.S.

Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease, told the committee that although the additional amount of money requested is high, it could reduce the HIV transmission rate by 50% over 12 years. Although the $4.8 billion request is a significant amount of money, it would be more expensive not to treat HIV, Fauci said. Each HIV infection costs more than $1 million in treatment and lost productivity and that if CDC can prevent 4,800 new infections over five years, the programs established with increased funding would be "cost saving to society."

Now, how much is that Wall Street bailout again?

More on Conspiracy Theories

Recently, I met what appeared to be an educated, older African American gentleman at presentation that I was giving. After exchanging contact information, he literally tracked me down to communicate what he claimed was "very important information" that would be valuable to my (BEBASHI'S) clients. The 'information' pertained to a book and a website both claiming to dispute that HIV causes AIDS as well a virtually every other scientific fact about HIV/AIDS. He also gave me information about a product that supposedly cures HIV.

I understand that many of us are skeptical about what the federal government and big business, (such as pharmaceutical companies) tell us. Therefore, I looked into this information. I read excerpts from the book; looked at the credentials of of the person who wrote it as well as the other 1500 or so members of his group; and read the so-called study that described the "experiment" testing the drug. I came away with the following question:

Why are we so quick to believe people with these alternative theories about HIV/AIDS who lack infectious disease research/treatment experience, credentials and any real standing in the scientific community, when there are mountains of reputable research and decades of practical experience to the contrary. How could one so-called study, or one book diminish all of the other evidence?

The Risk of STI'S with Other Sexual Activities

A new article by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published in the Journal: Obstetrics and Gynecology, reports that despite what many believe, "noncoital" sexual activities -- such as oral sex, mutual masturbation and anal sex still come with varying degrees of STI (sexually transmitted infection) risk.

Many people, especially adolescents, engage in oral, anal or mutual masterbation to reduce pregnancy risk, avoid using condoms thereby placing them at risk for acquiring an STI. In terms of HIV transmission, receptive anal sex carries the highest risk, followed by receptive vaginal sex. Therefore it is important to remember that anyone with whom one has sex, could potentially infect you with and STI, including HIV. Some of the ways to protect oneself are: Knowing one's partner-staying in a monogamous relationship and both of you getting tested for STI's before commencing sex; consistent and correct use of condoms for any kind of sex and; of course, abstinence.

Remember, not all STI's are curable and some are asymptomatic (meaning they do not have noticeable symptoms) So you might be infected and not even know it. Look before you leap!